Still playing the Shell Game
Four ways Shell impedes the just transition
Does a company – in which profit and shareholder satisfaction come at the cost of depriving populations around the world from resources and revenues they need to improve their health and secure their livelihoods – have the moral compass necessary to influence a “just” transition, even if it were to switch tomorrow to windmills and solar collectors? Is a just transition simply a question of switching from one source of energy to another, or is deeper, structural change required? And is such change possible when decision-making is skewed towards corporate interests?
A research group, consisting of Decolonisation Network Former Dutch East Indies (DNVNI), HandelAnders!, JA! Justiça Ambiental/Friends of the Earth Mozambique, Reclame Fossielvrij, TNI and SOMO, looked at Shell from different perspectives to expose, explain, and deconstruct a number of issues including: the company’s focus on profit-maximisation, how Shell thrives on inequality, how it undermines democratic decision-making, and how it misleads the public about future prospects. This report is a synthesis of the contributions written by the research group. The full articles can be found on the Future Beyond Shell website(opens in new window) .
Do you need more information?
-
Ilona Hartlief
Researcher
Partners
-
Friends of the Earth Mozambique
-
Decolonisation Network former Dutch East Indies
-
Fossielvrije Reclame
-
HandelAnders! Coalitie
-
Code Rood
Publication
Related content
-
Shell’s legal weapon to threaten a just energy futurePosted in category:Opinion
Bart-Jaap VerbeekPublished on:
Bart-Jaap Verbeek
-
-
Organisations urge Dutch Minister to avoid settlement with ShellPosted in category:Published on:Statement
-
Oil trader Vitol silent about its activities in high-risk NigeriaPosted in category:News
Saskia van DrunenPublished on:
